Jim Sandford - Frisk

Post your work here - Ask for feedback or just show it off
Post Reply
User avatar
jim_kezzle
Onions
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 7:03 pm
Jim Sandford - Frisk

Post by jim_kezzle »


dubdub
Asphyxiwank
Posts: 2454
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 1:49 pm
Re: Jim Sandford - Frisk

Post by dubdub »

The lowend doesn't really have a lot of punch, feels a bit flappy. That 808-ish hat is a bit too sharp and resonant in the high mids / high end. There's a lot of stuff rapidly flying around the stereo field, on headphones it's a bit much actually. Those drone-y sounds are a bit loud. That lead that comes in around 1:20 is a bit vanilla and dry, could use some filtering/FX etc. to make it more interesting.

auryn
Interact. Don't Spam.
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:36 pm
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:
Re: Jim Sandford - Frisk

Post by auryn »

I found that the background stuff was interesting and kept me listening but agree with the above poster about the bleep sound that comes in, it could do with some more variation either melodically or sound-wise. The rhythm was pretty sharp/tight soundwise but was also very sparsely arranged, could do with some more variation.

User avatar
Lost to the Void
subsekt
subsekt
Posts: 13518
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 1:31 pm
Re: Jim Sandford - Frisk

Post by Lost to the Void »

Yeah the mix is a bit messy.

It`s overly dense and the dynamics are inconsistent so you really need to dig in to this and clean it all up.

Kick starts all clear and present in the beginning and then pretty much gets more and more buried as elements are added.
This suggests to me that too many element have presence in the low end, so studious use of low cuts and low shelving on sounds to clear out the lows would help a lot.
Some big reverby lightsabre like sound comes in at about 36 seconds and it sounds removed from the mix spatially.
Everything is dense and solid up to the, and then this sound comes in and it pokes out on the right hand side of the mix, sitting outside the tune, so that could do with a more even stereo spread and pulling down in the mix.
Then the beep synth comes in and is more centred, further emphasising how out of place the previous sound is, it also sounds more inside the mix due to this.
Once the resonant build starts before the final hat comes in at 2:30 the mix is already full.
The hat has too much high frequency and volume, so it also pops out of the top of the mix and feel separate from everything.

It`s a tricky mix to deal with. Lots of big sounds, reverb, dense lows.
A studious and more clinical use of subtractive EQ will help, and possibly using some mid-side EQing so that the rhythmic elements sit in the centre and the more ambient elements sit on the sides, maybe sidechaining the sides to the kick will also help, just a touch.

Yeah, a tough one, you are going to have to work hard on this.
Mastering Engineer @ Black Monolith Studio
New Shit
Techno is dead. Long live Techno.

User avatar
ZenoSupreme
arsehole
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:01 pm
Re: Jim Sandford - Frisk

Post by ZenoSupreme »

Interesting track. agree witch comments above. I would spread out the elements over the track and with that change tha arrangement. And perhaps think about a string or a pad (in the background) to carry a homogeneous feeling throughout the whole track.

User avatar
jim_kezzle
Onions
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 7:03 pm
Re: Jim Sandford - Frisk

Post by jim_kezzle »

cheers for comments guys yes its a bit messy


Post Reply