subsekt

Just another techno track... Low end / low mids might be a bit too much, I'll possibly rework the mix a bit.



Opinions ?

Funky !!! Really want to make you shake yer booty <g>

There's a bit of resonance around 160Hz indeed, and except for the hat and noisy pad, the hi end might be a bit dull. Also the second synth line could do we being a wee bit more upfront.

Good job otherwise, I'm not sure this track needs much more

I don't think you need to add anything more - actually, I'd say this track would benefit from a bit "less" elements in terms of temporal density. My very humble opinion of course

"Long term goals" ??? What's that ???

illit_ wrote: ↑

Sat Aug 12, 2023 12:15 pm

Yeah great! Make techno fun again and all that haha

Definitely !!! There was some kind of "The Residents meet the dancefloor" humoresque flavor in early techno and house stuff that seem to have been lost since...

A very good way to start the day !!! This is the funniest (in a very good way) track I've heard for a long time - and it definitely has a great groove.

Different moods indeed, but to me those three tracks have enough of your signature sound and style to not clash that much with each other. This being said, I do understand what you mean. I like so many different genres of music - from Gregorian chant and Irish trad to punk/metal - that I can never b...

that second hat is the 909RideCymbal(TM) you suggested I added in the WIP thread :D oops :oops: :lol: Tried lowering the ride - do you think it sits better in the mix now? Mmm, I'm in two minds actually :oops: It does "sit better in the mix" indeed, but then it's perhaps loosing a bit too much ener...

Definitely not trance, and it has a detroit vibe indeed. The second hat (right after the break) is perhaps a touch too loud IMHO, but that's mostly a tastes and colors thing. GoodJob(tm) once again dude

I still upload my stuff on Soundcloud and I rarely share my music publicly on there so there's only a few people who listen to my tracks. Almost everything on my soundcloud is public, but there are still only a few people listening to my tracks... Must be doing something wrong I guess ? :lol: What ...

Saturation, compression, bit crushing, flanger, delays, a second reverb, mid-side processing, whatever. Oh and yes: automation of course. Also, mixing up a sidechained ambiance track into the same reverb, so it appears to be part of the reverb tail.

I like it. The groove and drive work really well. Its forward driving but laid back at the same time. I like the bassline, and i like tje somehow hollow feel that it has. But i think it could have a touch more upper harmonics, maybe dont open the filter more, but parallel saturate/distort/crunch it...

Wow ! TFW two of your fav local producers praise your track

Thanks guys, means much to me.

speen wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 12, 2023 8:00 am

dope dope dope

Thanks for the appreciation and useful feedback dude, will check those points

Is it house or tech-house ?

I am not too partial to the acid-esque synth, but amobe is right that it gives it a very retro feel. Thanks for the feedback 8-) Yeah I'm still unsure about this bassline, and yes I feel like I'd need a bit "more" in the first part (before the stabs come in) and a touch less in the second. Will pro...

The second mix seems to fix most of the the issues - sounds both deeper and punchier, and the high percs feel more connected to the rest of mix. Really like the mood / ambiance and the groove, good job sir !-)

Not quite my universe but good job nonetheless If you feel like sharing, I might be interested in trying a more techno-ish or trancey remix...

A rather "straight-ahead" track - as the name implies

Thoughts ?